X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <17393e3e0610301332p6e318bffx9a020247c71fe88c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:32:57 -0500 From: "Matt Wozniski" Reply-To: mjw AT drexel DOT edu To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Reboot vs. Restart Windows In-Reply-To: <45466D37.80708@wi.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4543C9A3 DOT 3000701 AT umiacs DOT umd DOT edu> <45441EC9 DOT 7070506 AT umiacs DOT umd DOT edu> <17393e3e0610282033p42489855ia8f6c4a287a60627 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4544242D DOT 7040706 AT umiacs DOT umd DOT edu> <4544887D DOT F92A899 AT dessent DOT net> <4544CE14 DOT 40603 AT umiacs DOT umd DOT edu> <4545F66A DOT 6020008 AT umiacs DOT umd DOT edu> <36966 DOT 130 DOT 49 DOT 222 DOT 185 DOT 1162241640 DOT squirrel AT webmail DOT cs DOT pitt DOT edu> <45466D37 DOT 80708 AT wi DOT rr DOT com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Having said that, there isn't an official way (that I'm aware of anyway) > to restart windows without restarting the system itself. However, I do > know a little trick that is supposed to be just as good. Open the task > manager, and find 'explorer.exe' in the process list. Perform an > end-task on this process. It should reload the windows system files, or > atleast thats my understanding. It's not just as good. Like I said, the reason a restart is needed is because Windows actually overwrites DLLs that are in use during the next reboot, once they're no longer locked. When explorer.exe is reloaded, it will reload all the files, but it won't load a newer version of them, since it won't know that there IS a newer version unless you explicitly overwrite the old version while explorer is still dead. Even then, you run into issues with SPF, which, IIRC, can't be disabled in XP SP2, and XP is likely to just overwrite the new one with the old one again. ~Matt On 10/30/06, Joey Officer wrote: > What you are referring to was the 'soft' restart. If you held the SHIFT > key (either I think) during a 'Shutdown -> Restart; it would restart > only the windows software. This worked on all versions of windows > through windows Me! ... It does not work on any current version of > Windows, due to the fact that current versions are built around Windows > NT, which did not have a DOS foundation. Windows 95/98/ME were > applications that ran on top of DOS, similar (atleast in concept) to the > really old Windows 3.x days (and older if you can think back that far). > > Having said that, there isn't an official way (that I'm aware of anyway) > to restart windows without restarting the system itself. However, I do > know a little trick that is supposed to be just as good. Open the task > manager, and find 'explorer.exe' in the process list. Perform an > end-task on this process. It should reload the windows system files, or > atleast thats my understanding. > > Good luck all. > joey > > > Benjamin Madore wrote: > > So as to add to the confusion... > > > > At one point, and maybe still, you could "Restart Windows" without rebooting > > your computer. If I recall correctly, it would drop to the subsystem (DOS?) > > and a message stating "Restarting Windows..." would display on your screen. > > > > So, restarting was not necessarily rebooting at one time. I don't know how > > this plays out, though, as either would do what you wanted. > > > > BTW, can one say they restarted Cygwin without restarting windows? Does that > > make sense? > > > > On Mon, October 30, 2006 7:56 am, Mike Maxwell said: > > > >> Certainly 'reboot' is used a lot. But the standard Ms Windows message > >> is 'restart Windows.' And I don't know the history, but I would not be > >> surprised if the reason it started being used (around the time of Win95 > >> or Win98, from what I can tell) is that it is less ambiguous--exactly > >> the point I've been trying to make. > >> -- > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > > > > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/