X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <454168EE.3020509@cygwin.com> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:03:26 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060916 Fedora/1.5.0.7-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygintl-3.dll was not found References: <58fb98730601070837k26ad68f5l AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <43BFEFB9 DOT EA24C5B4 AT dessent DOT net> <5718434 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <7022170 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <20061027002907 DOT GA6453 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <7022818 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> In-Reply-To: <7022818.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com gdiviney wrote: > I'm not going to get into a discussion about my assumptions or yours. You > have no idea who I am, what I have done or not done to solve this problem, > or even if I have solved this problem. You have no idea what forums I have > been in, how often I encounter or use Cygwin, or what my level of expertise > is. You are not qualified to discuss my assumptions, nor am I qualified to > discuss yours. However, a simple search for the file that is the topic of > the root of this thread will yield over 12,000 matches, and nearly all > appear to be "missing-bug" related. Thus, my criticism has credential and is > well deserved. Well, I did the following Google search: This seemed like a fairly obvious search to me. I got 2 results. The first was the original poster with a similar problem and the second was the reply from someone on this list. The person (Brian Dessent) explained how to find the needed package. > Furthermore, if Cygwin wants to be used by the windows community, then it > needs to be palatable to windows users. Not Linux users who occasionally > find themselves forced to use a windows box. Many of us are competent > developers who have better things to do than spend time pouring through > install procedures and innumerable tar files when modern methods have > rendered that kind of delivery, in this context, utterly unnecessary. It is not a goal of this project to have these tools be used by the "windows community". However, if individuals or groups in this community find the tools useful, it is also not a goal to keep them from using them. ;-) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/