X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <453ED2D3.6060900@cygwin.com> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:58:27 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060916 Fedora/1.5.0.7-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.5.21-1: CIFS symlinks on network share break Cygwin References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com You too. . Reformatted. Jonathan Lanier wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: cygwin-owner cygwin com [mailto:cygwin-owner cygwin com] On Behalf >> Of Larry Hall (Cygwin) >> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 6:25 PM >> To: cygwin cygwin com ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Yikes! Ditto - . Thanks. >> Subject: Re: 1.5.21-1: CIFS symlinks on network share break Cygwin >> >> . Reformatted. >> >> Champ Mendis wrote: >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" >>> cygwin com> >>> To: cygwin com> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >> . Thanks. >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:47 AM >>> Subject: Re: 1.5.21-1: CIFS symlinks on network share break Cygwin >>> >>> >>>> Jonathan Lanier wrote: >>>>> Well, I thought of that - first rule of debugging, calculatus >>>>> eliminatus. I tried it; but, attempts to use the older DLLs with >>>>> newer apps (or vice-versa) result in corrupted shared memory, and >>>>> force me to reboot my WinXP box. I've been under the impression >>>>> that cygwin1.dll isn't really meant to be cross-compatible with >>>>> applications built against other versions of Cygwin, which would >>>>> probably make the search useless. If anyone knows otherwise, I'm >>>>> keen to hear anything about cygwin1.dll-swapping that could be of >>>>> use - i.e. how far back I could go and expect to retain binary >> compatibility. >>>> There is backwards binary compatibility but not forward. So I'd >>>> suggest, if you're interested in trying this, that you use your >>>> 1.5.14 environment and swap in DLLs until it doesn't work. But keep >>>> your original DLL so you can "reset" it at the end. Start with the >>>> oldest snapshot and binary search your way in. >>> Hi, >>> I got the same problem, I ran Insight debugger too but it failed. Code >> >>> very well in new version of Cygwin but Exe file does not give any >>> output. Insight debugger says unknown error. >>> I was wondering whether XP Media Edition is conflicting with Cygwin >>> environment. >>> I tried the Cygwin1.dll to run in DOS mode but it failed. >>> I will also try the same thing as Jonathan says. >> >> >> Two additional thoughts on this: >> >> o If you have a small, simple test case in C, it's worth your while >> to consider sending it to the list. >> >> o You should send along your cygcheck output. Indeed, it's worthwhile >> to >> re-read . The more relevant >> details, >> the better! :-) >> >> > Um, I did both on my first post yesterday. :) > I know you did. I was responding to Champ. Of course he could use your if it reproduces for him. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/