X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Matthew Woehlke Subject: Re: costly accurate link counts, Vista compat...(was Re: questions about excessive disk usage when doing tab completion) Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:22:41 -0500 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <453AAF44 DOT 4040201 AT 666 DOT com> <453AB8FD DOT 3030209 AT byu DOT net> <453BB9AD DOT 7010505 AT tlinx DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 In-Reply-To: <453BB9AD.7010505@tlinx.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Linda Walsh wrote: > Of course Cygwin is already faster than MS's own POSIX subsystem; > Such compatibility may be one reason why MS dropped future revisions > of their Interix (POSIX) subsystem support. I wonder if it even > runs on Vista? For that matter, anyone tried Cygwin to see if there are > any compatibility issues for Cygwin on Vista? Eh? That would be news to me. Last I heard it had become "SUA" (Services for UNIX-based Applications) and was a core component of Windows. But it still sucks. :-) -- Matthew Only Joe suffers from schizophrenia. The rest of us enjoy it. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/