X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:40:58 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Angelo Graziosi <Angelo DOT Graziosi AT roma1 DOT infn DOT it>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Can't preview postscript files under xdvi
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0610162334360.6249-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com


Larry Hall wrote:

> As I recall, the reason for have a no-X version was so that people don't
> have to install X to use ghostscript.

I do not remember that on Linux there are X and no-X of ghostscript.

If Cygwin aims to reproduce Linux on Windows who installs Cygwin should
also installs a minimum of X.

In any case having two similar package seems confusing and, as the lists
show, we have some troubles.


Cheers,

   Angelo.  


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/