X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <452F529C.7030307@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 18:47:24 +1000
From: Gareth Pearce <tilps DOT kilm AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: aspell
References: <195b3f1f0610120103q7abd4584m676a9c2fb9478bbf AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <452DFDED DOT 2010209 AT gmail DOT com> <195b3f1f0610121914wa709340o2ec9471d76d4075a AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <195b3f1f0610121914wa709340o2ec9471d76d4075a@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com


> On 10/12/06, Gareth Pearce
>> I suspect you don't have nroff installed.  If that is not the 
>> problem,  it works for me -
> ....
> That would be too easy.  I already check that and nroff is indeed 
> installed.
>
> As for "works for" you, I suspect that you have an old version of
> aspell.  I am talking about 0.60.3 and the more recent stable 0.60.4
> versions.   Please download 0.60.4 and try it and let me know how it
> goes.
Ahh, I missed that you were using a version of aspell you built yourself 
as was implied by the newer version number.
>
>> --Gareth, somewhat vaguely present aspell maintainer being.
>
> I appreciate your response and with your assistance we'll find the
> cause and fix it and you can be the proud maintainer of new apsell,
> 0.60.4 that has a lot of great features and functionality.
>
See the vaguely present part; cygwin is a much lower priority on my todo 
list these days, so unless there is an issue with a released package 
which I am the maintainer for, I'm pretty much absent.
If I remember correctly, releasing a new aspell will require releasing a 
new aspell-en/aspell-de - and if I remember correctly, aspell-en doesn't 
even have a maintainer at the moment.

--Gareth, *may* take some time and look at updating his packages once 
nano 2.0 is released.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/