X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: mwoehlke Subject: Re: cygwin 1.5.21-2: ssh-add unable to connect to ssh-agent with McAfee installed Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 12:56:43 -0500 Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <452D1E8F DOT 4090908 AT cdvinc DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 In-Reply-To: <452D1E8F.4090908@cdvinc.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Tim Beuman wrote: > Matthew, > > There is a line "Content-Disposition: inline" which causes the > attachments to be shown inline. Could be the file-type that causes > Thunderbird to add this line to the section header. I will check if I > can convince Thunderbird to not include this line when sending .txt files. Hmm, yup, I bet that's it. See (1) for another example (note: I am also using Thunderbird). So, perhaps the question is why Jason complained in the first place, since this seems to be archive policy (and no one has complained at *me* for doing the same thing). Probably just overlooking "that's how the archiver works". :-) If you want to turn off "Content-Disposition: inline", that should be fine, but my impression is that some people prefer that to having to open attachments. :-) Maybe it would just be better if the archiver did like Thunderbird does and add an '
' or something to delineate attachments from actual inline content (and I wonder, do these things then show up when you search the archives?). Would be nice if one of the big names would make an intelligible (2) comment on this. (1) http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-09/msg00177.html (2) http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-10/msg00410.html <-- not intelligible ;-) -- Matthew Will your shell have salvation? Only if it's Bourne Again. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/