X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: mwoehlke <mwoehlke AT tibco DOT com>
Subject:  Re: cygwin 1.5.21-2: ssh-add unable to connect to ssh-agent with     McAfee installed
Date:  Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:33:26 -0500
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <egj2s6$kml$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <452C2879 DOT 9070406 AT cdvinc DOT com> <egh9v8$d5o$3 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <452C3C33 DOT 7050306 AT cygwin DOT com>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
In-Reply-To: <452C3C33.7050306@cygwin.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> mwoehlke wrote:
>> Tim Beuman wrote:
>>> Hi Jason,
>>> The "Ridiculous amount of stuff" was sent out as atachments but I 
>>> guess somehow it ended up inline. Sorry for that.
>>
>> Um... Huh. Thunderbird shows it as attachment. The web archive does 
>> not. Anyone that knows the mailer software have a guess what went wrong?
> 
> Look at the raw message:
> 
> <http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin/get-raw-msg?listname=cygwin&date=2006-10&msgid=452C15C2.4060800%40cdvinc.com> 

Not that I'm especially familiar with what I'm looking at, but that 
looked OK to me. Do *you* know who's dropping the ball here? Is Tim's 
mailer doing something funny or is the archiver not processing the 
message correctly? (I'm asking because either one should probably be 
looked into, although given that Thunderbird had no problems and the raw 
message looks OK to my eyeballs, it seems like the archiver ought to be 
handling this better than it obviously is.)

(Since this is rather OT, is there a better place to discuss possible 
shortcomings of the mail archiver?)

-- 
Matthew
Will your shell have salvation? Only if it's Bourne Again.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/