X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: mwoehlke <mwoehlke AT tibco DOT com>
Subject:  Re: Is there a way to install old version cygwin?
Date:  Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:35:02 -0500
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <eggp4m$acm$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <BAY21-F202C9847A961865752DF8E9130 AT phx DOT gbl> <45264546 DOT 3030008 AT byu DOT net> <452BE236 DOT 6000300 AT tlinx DOT org>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
In-Reply-To: <452BE236.6000300@tlinx.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Linda Walsh wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> For example, it may just be a matter of figuring out which scripts 
>> have DOS line endings but reside on binary mounts.
> ---
>    What was changed recently?  Was it that the old, line-read
> functions quietly removed CR's so bash (et al.) wouldn't see
> them even on "binary" mounts?

Any time you want to know "what changed recently", a good start is to 
look for the release announcement: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce

-- 
Matthew
KDE: Desktop Excellence


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/