X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:04:03 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: ImageMagick needs old X dlls - lyx/XmGrace fail because ImageMagick  doesn't work
Message-ID: <20061009200403.GB31128@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <452AA3B3 DOT 8030303 AT scytek DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <452AA3B3.8030303@scytek.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 03:32:03PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote:
>This is merely a reminder that some packages fail because the current
>Xorg version removed some dlls that are needed by ImageMagick.
>
>This is not a new issue, see here:
>
><http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2006-08/msg00052.html>
>
><http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-10/msg00236.html>

In absence of a maintainer for X or ImageMagick, the only likely
response from this kind of "reminder" is an annoyed sigh.

Or was this possibly a heads up that you were going to be taking over
one or the other package?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/