X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4526D0EB.4D2DAF1C@dessent.net> Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:55:55 -0700 From: Brian Dessent X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Requesting an updated gcc-mingw-g++ package to match gcc-g++-3.4.4-2 (PR24196) References: <028e01c6e864$02db7bf0$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Doyle Rhynard wrote: > I have been wondering for some time why Cygwin gcc is still in the 3.4.x > versions while the the current gcc is 4.1.1. The GNU gcc site states that the > 3.4.x has been closed with 3.4.6 being the final one. My only guess is that > Cygwin has a very cautious incremental upgrade policy. Because gcc 4.x is not quite stable yet on windows platforms. People tend to bitch when the included compiler doesn't work, so you can't just go throwing new versions out there. But if you want to play with it you can build 4.3 from source yourself right now. And if all you're doing is straight C it might even work fine. gcj, not so much. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/