X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: Similar Bash 3.1.18 CR/LF Problem
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 18:10:57 +0100
Message-ID: <01ff01c6e7d8$0f1367c0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <4C89134832705D4D85A6CD2EBF38AE0F7B137A@PAUMAILU03.ags.agere.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 04 October 2006 18:06, Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) wrote:


> Seriously, I'd have a hard time believing that supporting
> <CR><LF> endings would noticably impact performance if it
> were done as part of upstream BASH. Special-casing Cygwin
> (especially when you start doing things like checking for
> DOS paths, examining the first line, etc.) would impact
> performance, surely. So I agree--don't do that.

  That's a total non-sequitur.  A piece of code will have the same impact,
whether it's included directly in the upstream sources, or whether it's a
cygwin local patch surrounded by #ifdef __CYGWIN__.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/