X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Ken Wagnitz Subject: Re: Similar Bash 3.1.18 CR/LF Problem Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 08:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: <20061001013338 DOT GE1459 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <657A9BE009D3504AAE29BD8E8C2DD61E01A5ABFD AT SDGEXEVS02 DOT corp DOT intuit DOT net> <20061002205334 DOT GA3653 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes: > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 01:14:37PM -0700, Wilks, Dan wrote: > >cgf wrote: > >>I really am getting a bad feeling that, rather than FIXING THE SCRIPTS, > >>everyone is reverting to using text mode mounts which are not what we > >>generally recommend. > > ... > > If you want to continue to use Cygwin tools, you really should > investigate converting the generated scripts. ... > ... > People who have not been entirely clear on > what Cygwin is supposed to be or are not willing/able to adapt might be > left behind by this and other similar changes. > > cgf > > I am another who has been bitten by this change to the behaviour of Cygwin. Obviously I am one who is being "left behind". What platform is Cygwin written to run on? How would the Unix community react if someone ported a really nifty tool from the DOS/Windows world to Unix, but its data or script files had to have CR/LF endings for it to work? Ken. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/