X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <31b7d2790610031024sf315d8ck3d35680f74b8bceb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:24:33 +0100 From: "DePriest, Jason R." To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: updated bash to latest 3.1.17(8)-release; startup has errors now In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <31b7d2790610021512m6093d076i6609b5fc21c55030 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <45219876 DOT 40465402 AT dessent DOT net> <20061002230357 DOT GD2949 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4521A351 DOT 9090906 AT gmail DOT com> <31b7d2790610022224o7db4dc45pea5f4a63cb62dde6 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 10/3/06, mwoehlke <> wrote: > DePriest, Jason R. wrote: > > This google search was pretty much worthless when I ran it before I > > sent my message in: > > bash "command not found" site:cygwin.com inurl:ml > > If you've STFLA'd, it is good to mention this when asking your question. :-) > > > vi did not show any unusual line endings (CR/LF) in /etc/profile > > before I sent my message in > > ...and you know to look for '(dos)' in the status line, right? Although > as Larry pointed out, this is only reliable if vi[m] is configured a > certain way; ultimately, you might want to just try running d2u on it > regardless of what you *think* the line endings are. (Also, have you > checked that there is not some OTHER script being called at login, say > ~/.bash_profile, ~/.bashrc, etc) that has 'bad' line endings?) > > > I noticed that the cygcheck output said things weren't there when a > > manual check shows that they are there and that they are in the path > > that cygcheck says it is checking. > > > > For my issue, not the thread hijacking 'make' issue, I do not have a > > dual-core or hyperthreaded system. > > Hint: that was satire. ;-) > (And to explain/ruin the inside joke, 'make 3-81' was the previous > problem-that-everyone-reported-without-RTFRN'ing) > > > I did read the release notes when they came out. The ANNOUNCE list is > > the only one that I read all the messages for. It did not look like > > it should be causing the issues I am having. > > Ok, but again you should have mentioned that in your first e-mail... > Otherwise, as you can see, people jump to the obvious conclusion. > > Plus, the more information you give off the bat, the more likely someone > is to notice a problem and come up with a solution. > > -- > Matthew > "I don't question your existence -- God" (seen on a church billboard) > > > -- For some reason, I forgot to look for the [dos] as I thought vi would just show me the ^M at the end all the time. I am a bonehead for that. both od -c and vi -b show that, sure enough, there are plenty of \r\n in there. Oops and sorry to bother everyone, but at least I learned something out of it. -Jason -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/