X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:37:09 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-3.1-9 Message-ID: <20061003163709.GA1747@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 04:28:13PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote: >mwoehlke tibco.com> writes: >> Eric Blake wrote: >> > Second, this release adds a new shopt, igncr, which dynamically >> > tells bash to ignore all \r in the input file when it is set; however, it >> > defaults to unset. >> >> So, I keep wanting to know if you are thinking about submitting this >> upstream (or have you done so already?)... >> > >I'm hoping to port the patches to the 3.2 beta before proposing them upstream >(right now, my cygwin TODO list includes: get coreutils 6.3 stable ported to >cygwin, get bash 3.2beta ported to cygwin as experimental, post bash patches >upstream, update bash-completion to use cygport and add some long overdue >promised completion functions for cygwin). As written, my patch is >conditionalized on __CYGWIN__, but when proposing it upstream, I will try to >make it more generic. I really appreciate all of the time, thought, and effort you're putting into this, Eric. The Cygwin project is lucky to have you. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/