X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Eric Blake <ebb9 AT byu DOT net>
Subject:  Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-3.1-9
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:28:13 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 23
Message-ID:  <loom.20061003T182214-991@post.gmane.org>
References:  <announce DOT 4521DE28 DOT 5070301 AT byu DOT net> <efttfn$5rm$2 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

mwoehlke <mwoehlke <at> tibco.com> writes:

> 
> Eric Blake wrote:
> > Second, this release adds a new shopt, igncr, which dynamically
> > tells bash to ignore all \r in the input file when it is set; however, it
> > defaults to unset.
> 
> So, I keep wanting to know if you are thinking about submitting this 
> upstream (or have you done so already?)...
> 

I'm hoping to port the patches to the 3.2 beta before proposing them upstream 
(right now, my cygwin TODO list includes: get coreutils 6.3 stable ported to 
cygwin, get bash 3.2beta ported to cygwin as experimental, post bash patches 
upstream, update bash-completion to use cygport and add some long overdue 
promised completion functions for cygwin).  As written, my patch is 
conditionalized on __CYGWIN__, but when proposing it upstream, I will try to 
make it more generic.

-- 
Eric Blake



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/