X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: mwoehlke Subject: Re: updated bash to latest 3.1.17(8)-release; startup has errors now Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 09:45:35 -0500 Lines: 41 Message-ID: References: <31b7d2790610021512m6093d076i6609b5fc21c55030 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <45219876 DOT 40465402 AT dessent DOT net> <20061002230357 DOT GD2949 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4521A351 DOT 9090906 AT gmail DOT com> <31b7d2790610022224o7db4dc45pea5f4a63cb62dde6 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 In-Reply-To: <31b7d2790610022224o7db4dc45pea5f4a63cb62dde6@mail.gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DePriest, Jason R. wrote: > This google search was pretty much worthless when I ran it before I > sent my message in: > bash "command not found" site:cygwin.com inurl:ml If you've STFLA'd, it is good to mention this when asking your question. :-) > vi did not show any unusual line endings (CR/LF) in /etc/profile > before I sent my message in ...and you know to look for '(dos)' in the status line, right? Although as Larry pointed out, this is only reliable if vi[m] is configured a certain way; ultimately, you might want to just try running d2u on it regardless of what you *think* the line endings are. (Also, have you checked that there is not some OTHER script being called at login, say ~/.bash_profile, ~/.bashrc, etc) that has 'bad' line endings?) > I noticed that the cygcheck output said things weren't there when a > manual check shows that they are there and that they are in the path > that cygcheck says it is checking. > > For my issue, not the thread hijacking 'make' issue, I do not have a > dual-core or hyperthreaded system. Hint: that was satire. ;-) (And to explain/ruin the inside joke, 'make 3-81' was the previous problem-that-everyone-reported-without-RTFRN'ing) > I did read the release notes when they came out. The ANNOUNCE list is > the only one that I read all the messages for. It did not look like > it should be causing the issues I am having. Ok, but again you should have mentioned that in your first e-mail... Otherwise, as you can see, people jump to the obvious conclusion. Plus, the more information you give off the bat, the more likely someone is to notice a problem and come up with a solution. -- Matthew "I don't question your existence -- God" (seen on a church billboard) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/