X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: X-Sender: franki2006 AT hotmail DOT com In-Reply-To: <452103B5.2080406@byu.net> From: "Frank Illenseer" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Problems with archiver "ar" Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:30:12 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >Don't mount to /cygdrive/c/DATA/; mount points to a subdirectory of >/cygdrive don't really do any good, because the path resolution does not >look for mount points residing inside /cygdrive. Instead, mount >c:\data\myproject to a POSIX path (ie. something like /myProject). Thanks, Eric, for pointing this out. - That clarifies all! > > PS: The problem with "ar" is still there and I think (as Eric pointed > > out) that "ar" is not correctly reading in binmode/textmode. Once I > > solved the mounting problems, I will do some more tests with "ar". > >What more needs to be tested? Until cgf releases a new binutils with an >update to ar that forces binary mode on all archival actions, the current >behavior on textmounts isn't going to change. Thus I think the error seems to be clear and I need no further testing. (I just wanted to narrow doewn, but you guys are rather familiar with the source code and already know what is going wrong.) Thanks! - And I am really looking forward to the next releases. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/