X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:38:20 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cywin/x issues
Message-ID: <20060926223820.GA3911@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <6516394 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6516394.post@talk.nabble.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:35:58PM -0700, captainmidnight wrote:
>4) XMing better?
>
>It looks like cygwin/x has been defunct for a long while now.  In contrast,
>this website
>	http://www.straightrunning.com/XmingNotes/
>claims that the XMing program is actively developed and a lot better.
>
>Anyone have any experience with it versus cygwin/x?

If they do, this is not the mailing list to discuss it.  Either use the xming
or cygwin-xfree mailing lists, please.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/