X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4517D3A4.6070809@princeton.edu> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:03:32 -0400 From: Vinod Gupta User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Speeding up Cygwin deployment Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > >> C:\cygwin\usr\share\man\man1\allec.1 > >> C:\cygwin\usr\X11R6\lib\X11\doc\html\atobm.1.html > > I don't have a system against which to check this conjecture, but if > you do a DOS attrib on each of these files my guess is that the first > is created as a +R symlink and the second as a +S symlink*; and if you > do a DOS dir the first will be revealed as a .lnk file and the second > will not. It looks to me as though the zipper you're using understands > and can re-create files of the first sort, but the second goes wrong. > > (Or maybe even +S +H which might help explain its invisibility, but > don't think so.) > > For different but similar reasons (the need to copy an entire Cygwin > system to other file systems via a DVD which can faithfully transfer > +R but not +S files whilst preserving these attributes) I have gone > through the system re-creating all original +S symlinks as +R. If the > above conjecture is true / looks as though it might be true, and if > you think this re-creation might help I can send you the script. Fergus You are right. The first file has R and the second one has S attrib set. So, I guess your script to change all the S attribs to R should work for me too. Could you please send it to me. I am wondering: Why would they set these html files as System files? Why info-zip (or probably any DOS app) can't restore them?? Why WinXP's internal unzipper goes an order of magnitude slower if the archive has S files??? Thanks, Vinod -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/