X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:18:13 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: MINGW GCC WIN64 port? Message-ID: <20060918191813.GA29609@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <8540148a0609180953g4ea13955m9da15e47928c4f41 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 01:26:31PM -0500, mwoehlke wrote: >William Deegan wrote: >>This may be a little off topic, but I beleive there's enough of an >>audience here to make it worthwhile. >> >>One of my clients is interested in getting MINGW working on win64. >>We're considering engaging codesourcery to do the work. >>Anyone out there interested/able to co-funding the work? > >For the record, I know I saw something somewhere within the last month >or two about binutils adding support for win64, which is a major part of >this project. If you aren't the person that made the announcement I am >thinking of, you might want to be careful about not duplicating work >that someone else is already doing. (I'd have to think that whoever is >working on it already would appreciate help, however.) The patch has been submitted so I think the only help required is to test it. The discussion is going on in the binutils_AT_sourceware_PERIOD_org mailing list. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/