X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 14:14:39 -0500
From: Charles Plager <cplager+cygwin AT physics DOT ucla DOT edu>
Subject: Status of gcc 3.4.4-2
To: Cygwin Mailing list <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-id: <44FF1E1F.1070004@physics.ucla.edu>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hello,

	I am wondering if/when gcc 3.4.4-2 (or similar) will be promoted from 
'experimental' to 'current'.  There were issues building CERN's Root 
package with older versions of cygwin's gcc that now seem to be fixed 
(e.g., http://root.cern.ch/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3255).  It will be 
easier to convince our friends at CERN to start using the new compiler 
by default when it is the 'default' version.

	Cheers,
	  Charles Plager

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/