X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: mwoehlke Subject: Re: POSIX names for drive letters Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:32:08 -0500 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <44EC423D DOT 7020807 AT student DOT lu DOT se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.5) Gecko/20060719 Thunderbird/1.5.0.5 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: mingw-msys AT lists DOT sourceforge DOT net X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Schwarz, Konrad wrote: > Hi, > > I know that it is kind of late :-), but I would like to suggest an > alternative/additional mapping of drive letters to the MinGW and Cygwin > file-system name space. > > The proposed mapping for directory `C:\' is `//./C$/' (or perhaps > `//./C/'). > > The reasons for this mapping are: > [snip] So... why exactly do you need this? The only thing I might actually support here (keeping in mind Eric's comments and CGF's clear agreement with them) would be treating '//./' as a special case of '//127.0.0.1/', at which point '//./C$/' is the UNC mapping of the default 'C$' share on the local machine. But I still fail to see why that is useful. Or you could change your mount prefix to '/dev/fs', and have '/dev/fs/c', etc, which seems more "natural" and is also what Interix uses (so you have compatibility in case you ever use that POS). -- Matthew '$ time make world' -> real 5d:14h:37m:5.291s user 0m:0.000s sys 4d:2h:14m:43.712s -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/