X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20060817111612.03b50010@pop.nycap.rr.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:25:33 -0400 To: Dave Korn , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "William A. Hoffman" Subject: RE: change in behavior of make from 3.80 to 3.81 In-Reply-To: <00f501c6c20f$29eddbf0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> References: <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060817105707 DOT 0a66f6d0 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> <00f501c6c20f$29eddbf0$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com At 11:09 AM 8/17/2006, Dave Korn wrote: >On 17 August 2006 16:01, William A. Hoffman wrote: > >> At 10:49 AM 8/17/2006, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> I've already mentioned once that this was the wrong mailing list for this. >>> Why do you seem to need everything repeated at you? >>> >>> If you, or anyone, is having problems with MinGW's make it would behoove >>> you to discuss the problems in a mailing list which was populated by people >>> who are familiar with it. >> >> Because I do not agree with your suggestion. > > You don't agree that this is the cygwin list, not the mingw list? > > That really explains everything that's wrong with you in a single sentence. I answered a question posted on this list. I certainly never said this was the mingw list, I said that this topic was IMO fair for this list. Those are two different things. You are misquoting me. -Bill -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/