X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: change in behavior of make from 3.80 to 3.81
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:09:41 +0100
Message-ID: <00f501c6c20f$29eddbf0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20060817105707.0a66f6d0@pop.nycap.rr.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 17 August 2006 16:01, William A. Hoffman wrote:

> At 10:49 AM 8/17/2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> I've already mentioned once that this was the wrong mailing list for this.
>> Why do you seem to need everything repeated at you?
>> 
>> If you, or anyone, is having problems with MinGW's make it would behoove
>> you to discuss the problems in a mailing list which was populated by people
>> who are familiar with it.
> 
> Because I do not agree with your suggestion.   

  You don't agree that this is the cygwin list, not the mingw list?

  That really explains everything that's wrong with you in a single sentence.


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/