X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20060817105707.0a66f6d0@pop.nycap.rr.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:00:48 -0400
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "William A. Hoffman" <billlist AT nycap DOT rr DOT com>
Subject: Re: change in behavior of make from 3.80 to 3.81
In-Reply-To: <20060817144927.GG17328@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
References: <17632 DOT 65094 DOT 528377 DOT 623813 AT segfault DOT lan>  <009a01c6bfff$934e8480$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>  <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20060814213115 DOT 093f2a40 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com>  <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0608142225030 DOT 13215 AT access1 DOT cims DOT nyu DOT edu>  <20060815031725 DOT GB18949 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>  <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060815083334 DOT 07ab5470 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com>  <20060815210221 DOT GB4783 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>  <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060816092323 DOT 0b449ad0 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com>  <E1GDdID-0001Dt-F9 AT fencepost DOT gnu DOT org>  <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060817090639 DOT 0a662c40 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com>  <20060817144927 DOT GG17328 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

At 10:49 AM 8/17/2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>I've already mentioned once that this was the wrong mailing list for this.
>Why do you seem to need everything repeated at you?
>
>If you, or anyone, is having problems with MinGW's make it would behoove
>you to discuss the problems in a mailing list which was populated by people
>who are familiar with it.

Because I do not agree with your suggestion.   Apparently you need things
repeated to you.  So, here is my reason for the post again.
You mentioned MinGW as an alternative, it does not work.
Also, someone on this list asked me a question, and I answered it.  

-Bill


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/