X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:09:23 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: change in behavior of make from 3.80 to 3.81 Message-ID: <20060817120923.GF20467@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Eli Zaretskii References: <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060816091525 DOT 0ab90af0 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> <20060816144110 DOT GX20467 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060816111421 DOT 0b446b60 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> <20060816155054 DOT GY20467 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060816144036 DOT 09695af0 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> <20060817093551 DOT GD20467 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Aug 17 05:46, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Windows doesn't allow colons anywhere else in file names anyway. > > > > That's not quite right. Colons are also used in file names when the > > file name denotes an alternative named stream on NTFS file systems. > > Right, I forgot about this obscure feature. > > However, this feature is not specific to Cygwin, so if support for > such names is important (I suspect it isn't, but that's me), GNU Make > should be modified to support them in all Windows ports; any solution > that is good for other Windows ports will be good for Cygwin, and vice > versa. Do you agree? Hmm, no, sorry. I can't agree to "any solution that is good for other Windows ports will be good for Cygwin". This should be decided on a case by case basis. As for the NTFS streams, I mentioned them so that they are not left out of the discussion. Personally I agree with you that the support for such names isn't overly important for make. The reasin is this: Colons are only a problem in the TARGETS and PREREQUISITES part of a make rule, not in the COMMAND part. But it only makes marginal sense to use the ADS name for dependency checks, because a file has only one set of timestamps for the whole file, not multiple timestamps, one per data stream. The availablilty on only one filesystem type restricts the usefulness further. So the ability to use ADS names in the COMMAND part of a rule should be sufficient. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/