X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20060816144036.09695af0@pop.nycap.rr.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:08:54 -0400
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "William A. Hoffman" <billlist AT nycap DOT rr DOT com>
Subject: Re: change in behavior of make from 3.80 to 3.81
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0608161418370.9095@access1.cims.nyu.edu>
References: <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060815151104 DOT 0b40e260 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com>  <01b901c6c116$21259430$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>  <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060816091525 DOT 0ab90af0 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com>  <20060816144110 DOT GX20467 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>  <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060816111421 DOT 0b446b60 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com>  <20060816155054 DOT GY20467 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>  <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0608161418370 DOT 9095 AT access1 DOT cims DOT nyu DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

At 02:20 PM 8/16/2006, Igor Peshansky wrote:
>On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>Not only that, but the upstream maintainer actually suggested a couple of
>avenues of investigation to make the patch smaller by using functionality
>already built into the upstream make.  All that remains is for someone to
>actually "do the work" (tm).


Paul suggested adding the define 
HAVE_DOS_PATHS to the cygwin build of gnu make:

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00882.html


Christopher countered with, 

"There is no advantage using cygwin if you want to use a Makefile which
contains MS-DOS paths. Using MinGW makes perfect sense in that case.
Despite having suggested this repeatedly, it seems some users are still
not clear on this concept."

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00886.html


Latter in the thread, Paul said this:

"Regardless, I still wonder whether my idea of building make for a POSIX
environment with Cygwin, but setting HAVE_DOS_PATHS explicitly, would
work."
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00910.html


Eli  then replied with this:

"When HAVE_DOS_PATHS is defined, Make tries very hard to treat
backslashes and forward slashes in file names in the same manner.  The
only case I remember where we intentionally do NOT treat backslashes
as forward slashes is in the $wildcard function (and in fact in any
other situation that calls `glob' or `fnmatch').
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00938.html


So, it sounds like from the thread Paul suggested 
setting HAVE_DOS_PATHS to true for the cygwin build,
but Christopher does not think that MS-DOS paths have
a place in a cygwin version of make.   

I would be willing to try compiling the upstream make
with HAVE_DOS_PATHS to see if it works for me.  However,
if I report back that it works great, then what?  
Christopher would you change the build for cygwin make
to have this option?

-Bill


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/