X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Chris Croughton <chris AT keristor DOT net>
Subject:  Is anyone packaging gcal?
Date:  Sat, 12 Aug 2006 20:19:17 +0100
Lines: 13
Message-ID:  <slrnedsadl.b6r.chris@ccserver.keris.net>
Reply-To: chris AT keristor DOT net
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

I had a look on the packages search for gcal (the GNU calendar program)
and it doesn't seem to be there (it wasn't in the setup.exe list, so I
searched in case it was included in another package).  It does build
"out of the box" using gcc, so this wasn't a great hardship, but I was
wondering whether anyone is thinking of packaging it and if not whether
there would be any interest if I packaged it (since it doesn't need any
patches it seems fairly simple to do, and as it's GPL the licence
wouldn't be a problem).  I looked at the web pages on packaging, but
didn't see anything which said how you become a packager or maintainer
or whether you need authorisation to upload a package, have I missed
something?

Chris C


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/