X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: Subject: RE: Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found] Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:59:44 +0100 Message-ID: <00f701c6bd56$c81c68e0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <44DC9485.6050208@cygwin.com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 11 August 2006 15:30, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > It's also worth noting that the goal here was a subset of Cygwin > functionality packaged as a monolithic (no matter how small) install. > While the former is a potential supplement to "setup.exe", the latter is a > step backward in terms of installation flexibility. It seems to me that > any "setup.exe" replacement cannot be monolithic installer or provide only > a subset of the available packages. Well, just because it's a monolithic installer wouldn't stop it from reading setup.ini and downloading the latest versions of the base packages 'behind the scenes'. Perhaps the easiest solution would be a customized version of setup.exe that doesn't present the GUI and runs through the sequences of operations with everything on default settings. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/