X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: mwoehlke <mwoehlke AT tibco DOT com> Subject: Re: Um... what format are Cygwin manpages? Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:21:38 -0500 Lines: 46 Message-ID: <ebfiu4$4pn$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <ebd0om$gjh$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <cb51e2e0608092159t14175e52jeb656ffd2cc123a1 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.5) Gecko/20060719 Thunderbird/1.5.0.5 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 In-Reply-To: <cb51e2e0608092159t14175e52jeb656ffd2cc123a1@mail.gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > On 8/9/06, mwoehlke wrote: >> I thought I'd have a crack at fixing the manpage for printf(3) (see >> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-08/msg00288.html), but when I opened >> it, I was a bit shocked to discover that it is only *MARGINALLY* in >> troff format. I do note that other manpages seem more "normal" (man1 >> pages, for instance)... So, is this just "how the C lib manpages are"? > > Yes, it's sort-of my fault. I just have a Perl script that chunks the > newlib libc.info files into faux man pages. Ah, ok, makes sense. Too bad newlib doesn't have proper manpages, in that case. Although am I understanding that newlib itself doesn't have *any* manpages, meaning a: I need to be fixing their INFO, and b: any manpages should be sent this way after all? (Btw, symlinks for sprintf, fprintf, snprintf, etc, seem to be missing?) Anyway, if you're maintaining info->man, I totally understand why that would have the format it does. I would be more confused if someone was actually maintaining not-nroff nroff. :-) > Be careful with Linux man pages, some are licensed from the Open Group. > If so the package should come with a copyright file like this: > > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/m/manpages-posix/manpages-posix_1.67-3/manpages-posix.copyright > > Unfortunately we are not allowed to redistribute those, unless you'd like > to do the legwork to get permission to do so. :) .\" Copyright (c) 1999 Andries Brouwer (aeb AT cwi DOT nl) .\" .\" This is free documentation; you can redistribute it and/or .\" modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as .\" published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of .\" the License, or (at your option) any later version. I assume the above is OK? :-) > Also I just posted for upload a new cygwin-doc package before I read > this thread, so there would be more of a delay. Bummer. Oh, well. -- Matthew vIMprove your life! Now on version 7! -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/