X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: mwoehlke Subject: Re: Um... what format are Cygwin manpages? Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:10:11 -0500 Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.5) Gecko/20060719 Thunderbird/1.5.0.5 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com mwoehlke wrote: > mwoehlke wrote: >> I thought I'd have a crack at fixing the manpage for printf(3) (see >> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-08/msg00288.html), but when I opened >> it, I was a bit shocked to discover that it is only *MARGINALLY* in >> troff format. I do note that other manpages seem more "normal" (man1 >> pages, for instance)... So, is this just "how the C lib manpages are"? >> >> I am not going to submit a "patch" on this mess. If I do anything with >> it, I am going to submit a proper troff document. Given how much work >> I would have to do to fix the existing page, I am much more inclined >> to take my printf.3 from my Linux box and adjust it into consistency >> with Cygwin's printf() instead. I'm willing to clean up the existing >> manpage, but I think the style of the Linux manpage would be an >> improvement (what we have looks like it came from HP-UX or something). >> >> Any opinions? > > Ok, no doubt this manpage needs to be overhauled. I am going from the > Linux page and finding several omissions in the one currently in Cygwin > ("%F", as well as "%ll?"). > > WCTS, does anyone know to what extent locale stuff is supported? The > "%'" modifier? "%*d", etc? "%$1d", etc? "%*1$d", etc? Ok, experimenting shows that all of the above EXCEPT "%'" are supported (no great surprise). However, I also noticed that "%a", which is required by C99, is not supported? I have a modified Linux manpage almost ready to go; I assume that goes to cygwin.patches? -- Matthew This is not the list you're looking for. -- Perversion of Obi Wan -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/