X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: Subject: RE: make 3.81-1 vs. 3.80-1 and C:\... style dependency handling differences Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:55:55 +0100 Message-ID: <002f01c6bb9a$01f8fb50$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <162A2370-4416-4168-BDB8-FDF9879A9E32@dsl-only.net> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 09 August 2006 09:30, Mark Millard wrote: > Does the Cygwin 3.81-1 make at least match RMS's June 2004 definition > of what make 3.81 should be like on MS-Windows? No, the _mingw_ version of make 3.81 matches RMS's definition of what make 3.81 should be like on MS-Windows. The cygwin version matches RMS's definition of what make 3.81 should be like on a posix/linux/gnu/unix platform. Which is what it is supposed to do. You can always use setup.exe to revert to 3.80, you know. It *will* still accept DOS paths. [ Or you can hang on for a while until I get around to ITPing remake.... ] cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/