X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-BigFish: V From: Vladimir Dergachev Subject: Re: NTFS fragmentation Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:49:41 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <05b201c6b6dd$d84695d0$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> In-Reply-To: <05b201c6b6dd$d84695d0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline To: "Undisclosed.Recipients": ; Message-Id: <200608031349.41547.vdergachev@rcgardis.com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thursday 03 August 2006 5:18 am, Dave Korn wrote: > On 03 August 2006 00:46, Vladimir Dergachev wrote: > > > Hi Vladimir, > > >>> Please CC me - I am not on the list. > > Done :) > > Actually, maybe the most informative thing would be to look at the device > IO controls sent by both testcases, using filemon or similar. Thank you for the suggestion ! I used filemon and discovered that all three programs (ntfs_test.tcl, Firefox and IE) use sequential access, but IE writes the file first to Temporary Internet Files folder and then copies it. If one runs analyze from defragmenter while IE is still downloading the file the file in the Temporary Internet Files folder is just as fragmented as other files. I guess this means that sequential writes are officially broken on NTFS. Anyone has any idea for a workaround ? It would be nice if a simple tar zcvf a.tgz * does not result in a completely fragmented file. thank you Vladimir Dergachev > > > cheers, > DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/