X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <89b7ca960607300927y54ac6823i68110c88c50c4095@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:27:19 -0700 From: "Alex Eng" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.5.21: file timestamp not updated after editing In-Reply-To: <20060730134229.GD8152@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <89b7ca960607291929u28fd2020kcc0dc399dbf9d5e1 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20060730134229 DOT GD8152 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 7/30/06, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jul 29 19:29, Alex Eng wrote: > > After editing a file, the timestamp on the file (according to ls -l) > > is unchanged. However if stat is executed, the change > > timestamp given in the output differs from that given in ls -l: > > > > $ ls -l foo.c > > -rw-r--r-- 1 Alex 126 Jul 29 17:10 foo.c > > $ nano foo.c > > ### File is edited and saved ### > > $ ls -l foo.c > > -rw-r--r-- 1 Alex 289 Jul 29 17:10 foo.c > > $ stat foo.c > > File: `foo.c' > > Size: 289 Blocks: 1 IO Block: 1024 regular file > > Device: a8dc98beh/2833029310d Inode: 562949953426654 Links: 1 > > Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 1004/ Alex) Gid: ( 513/ None) > > Access: 2006-07-29 18:19:09.921875000 -0700 > > Modify: 2006-07-29 17:10:44.531250000 -0700 > > Change: 2006-07-29 18:19:15.828125000 -0700 > > I can't reproduce this problem at all. Assuming nano changes the file > in place, opposed to editors like vim, which recreate the file on write, > then a simple open/write/close like this: > > #include > #include > #include > > int > main (int argc, char **argv) > { > int fd = open (argv[1], O_WRONLY); > if (fd < 0) > { > fprintf (stderr, "open(%s): %d <%s>\n", > argv[1], errno, strerror (errno)); > return 1; > } > --argc; ++argv; > while (--argc > 0) > { > ++argv; > write (fd, *argv, strlen (*argv)); > } > close (fd); > return 0; > } > > would have the same effect. It hasn't, at least not in my testing. > Is there a chance that you're suffering from a malice virus scanner? > > > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to > Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Red Hat > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > I disabled Norton Antivirus 2005 and ZoneAlarm firewall, but the problem is still present. I did some further troubleshooting and found that this problem doesn't occur anymore if I'm running Cygwin while Windows XP is in safe mode. But it happens again if I start Windows using the "Safe Mode With Networking" option. I've been able to reproduce this consistently. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/