X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:52:21 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.5.20: Occasional crash at address 0x6100365f (cygthread::stub() in cygthre Message-ID: <20060728145221.GD16728@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20060721103154 DOT 29758 DOT qmail AT web86910 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> <44C804C6 DOT 9040001 AT cygwin DOT com> <20060727135915 DOT GB27786 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:35:15PM +1000, Kiyo Kelvin Lee wrote: >I am quite sure I am doing that correctly. >I have checked all cygwin processes using System Explorer (from System >Internals) and they all are having the suggested CYGWIN setting. >BTW, is there any way to test if the setting is really effectively? >Say, is there any intentionally broken program which would activate the >setting? Write a program which SEGVs, something like: int main (int argc, char **argv) { int *i = (int *) 0; *i = 27; } cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/