X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17609.11894.362091.111863@lemming.engeast.baynetworks.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:21:58 -0400 To: Brian Dessent , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, bug-make AT gnu DOT org Subject: Re: 3.81 and windows paths In-Reply-To: <17609.11132.462789.443104@lemming.engeast.baynetworks.com> References: <20060727195042 DOT GC27890 AT brasko DOT net> <44C92033 DOT A2978A8E AT dessent DOT net> <17609 DOT 11132 DOT 462789 DOT 443104 AT lemming DOT engeast DOT baynetworks DOT com> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 From: "Paul D. Smith" Reply-To: "Paul D. Smith" Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com %% I wrote: pds> I believe that this support is limited to handling drive letters without pds> choking on the ":", actually: IIRC the native support still requires pds> forward slashes (/) rather than backslashes (\). I could be wrong pds> though. I'm not sure how Cygwin's pathname management patches worked. pds> In fact, I'm wondering if there is an advantage to building GNU make pds> using the Cygwin environment, vs. using a native MingW (for example) pds> build of GNU make? I'm afraid I'm woefully ignorant about the details. Now that I think about this more... There is a separate #define use to enable/disable special handling of DOS pathnames in vanilla GNU make: HAVE_DOS_PATHS This feature is not controlled by the generic WINDOWS32 #define. I don't see any reason, offhand, that HAVE_DOS_PATHS couldn't be set in the Cygwin build of GNU make, even though that build is otherwise using standard POSIX and not the Windows system API. In theory that would very easily allow the Cygwin build of GNU make to continue to be a Cygwin application, but with added support for DOS pathnames similar to what you get if you build for native Windows. Of course I've never tried this combination so there may be more to it (it may use some special functions under the w32 directory, and/or there may be some incorrectly #ifdef'd sections of code that need to be fixed). But, it might be worth pursuing. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Smith Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/