X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 23:11:07 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin copy problems usb 2.0 Message-ID: <20060727211107.GB4348@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <5519828 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <5528112 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <44C91F4A DOT 8050404 AT cygwin DOT com> <20060727201931 DOT GD3409 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <5528898 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5528898.post@talk.nabble.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jul 27 13:48, aldana wrote: > > isn't there a possibitly that cygwin provides a quicker cp-implementation? > i mean 4 minutes for a copy of 70MB to a memstick (instead of CopyFile() 20 > sec.) is not really good performance. > i guess there is a reason for that... Right, how did you know? The reason is that cp is a portable implementation using simple reads and writes to perform the copy. There's no such thing as a CopyFile routine on POSIX systems. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/