X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: Subject: RE: 1.5.21-1 DLL Loading Problem Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:05:43 +0100 Message-ID: <012d01c6b09b$0e98c430$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <44C6B776.2080600@zedasoft.com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 26 July 2006 01:30, Rob Hatcherson wrote: > The general situation is that I have a program that depends on "B.dll", > which in turn depends on "A.dll". Both DLLs provide C++ classes. The > > In the meantime, does anyone have any suggestions regarding what's going > on, and/or some other technique to catch this problem? Are you using C++ string classes? Would you like to try recompiling it all using the new experimental gcc-3.4.4-2 release? It addresses at least one known problem with C++ vs. DLLs. http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2006-07/msg00021.html cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/