X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:05:21 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.5.21 release imminent - please test latest snapshot Message-ID: <20060714140521.GB3349@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 12:16:12PM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote: >Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> Well, Monday. Isn't that explicit enough? Do you also need the year? > > >The original post (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00188.html) was >dated 20060707. > >Perhaps it would be sufficient a 1.5.20-2 that fix this >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00145.html. Or, maybe you could just assume that if cygwin wasn't released there might be a reason? Did you see any actual testing of the snapshot, for instance? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/