X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:43:15 -0500 From: Brian Ford Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.5.21s mmap error In-Reply-To: <20060712165900.GQ8759@calimero.vinschen.de> Message-ID: References: <20060712165900 DOT GQ8759 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-559023410-771380141-1152729795=:2284" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com ---559023410-771380141-1152729795=:2284 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jul 12 10:48, Brian Ford wrote: > > This is just a heads up for now as I plan to try and produce an STC > > with cygcheck output later today or tomorrow as time allows. But, just in > > case it rings any bells... > > Does it work with 1.5.20? No, nor 1.5.19. 1.5.19 broke several things with respect to our application like: needing to sync the Windows environment with the Cygwin one due to a use of CreateProcess, needing to increase the scheduler resolution via timeBeginPeriod back to 1 ms, dealing with the .exe that is now appended to the /proc/self/exe symbolic link, etc. These were all our issues; not Cygwin ones. There was one Cygwin one with clock_[get|set]res that affected nanosleep in 1.5.19, but I submitted a patch for that and it is now included in 1.5.20. The point is, I've just gotten around to fixing all these known problems in our application and retesting. So please, no one complain that I didn't report it sooner. > *corinna mumbles something about a reproducible, self-contained testcase... * Brian mumbles about all the qualifications that one was coming soon when time permitted that were trying to avoid Corinna's mumbling above. Brian also mumbles that the attached STC is nothing more than wrapping the code fragment quoted in the previous message with a main, setting the variables as the comments indicated, and manually stripping out the preprocessor conditionals. * STC attached. (Why is it that no matter how hard I try to avoid objections to my emails I ALWAYS get them anyway? I know, WJM. I just tend to agree with others that this doesn't foster any good will in the Cygwin community. Yeah, I know, TITTTL, but I don't read that list.) -- Brian Ford Lead Realtime Software Engineer VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems FlightSafety International the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained pilot... . ---559023410-771380141-1152729795=:2284 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="mmaptest.c" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="mmaptest.c" I2luY2x1ZGUgPHN5cy9tbWFuLmg+DQojaW5jbHVkZSA8c3lzL3R5cGVzLmg+ DQojaW5jbHVkZSA8c3lzL3N0YXQuaD4NCiNpbmNsdWRlIDxmY250bC5oPg0K I2luY2x1ZGUgPHN0ZGlvLmg+DQojaW5jbHVkZSA8dW5pc3RkLmg+DQoNCg0K aW50DQptYWluKHZvaWQpDQp7DQogICAgaW50ICAgZmQsIHZpcnRfc2l6ZTsN CiAgICB2b2lkICphZGRyOw0KDQogICAgZmQgPSAtMTsNCg0KICAgIGFkZHIg ICAgICA9IE5VTEw7DQogICAgdmlydF9zaXplID0gMHgxODAwMDAwMDsNCiAg ICBhZGRyID0gbW1hcChhZGRyLCB2aXJ0X3NpemUsIChQUk9UX1JFQUR8UFJP VF9XUklURSksDQoJCShNQVBfTk9SRVNFUlZFfE1BUF9QUklWQVRFfE1BUF9B Tk9OKSwgZmQsIDApOw0KICAgIGlmIChhZGRyID09IE1BUF9GQUlMRUQpDQog ICAgew0KCXBlcnJvcigibWFwcGluZyBWTSBzY3JhdGNoIHNwYWNlIik7DQoJ Y2xvc2UoZmQpOw0KCXJldHVybiAtMTsNCiAgICB9DQoNCiAgICAqKHZvbGF0 aWxlIGNoYXIgKilhZGRyOw0KDQogICAgcmV0dXJuIDA7DQp9DQo= ---559023410-771380141-1152729795=:2284 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ---559023410-771380141-1152729795=:2284--