X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:35:11 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Is anything getting through to the list? Message-ID: <20060711213511.GA2577@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <44B3B3FF DOT 90205 AT bluebottle DOT com> <035c01c6a4fe$aa8bb990$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20060711154156 DOT GB25535 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <44B3F575 DOT 1020409 AT bluebottle DOT com> <20060711192428 DOT GA32309 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <44B4129A DOT 5050401 AT cygwin DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44B4129A.5050401@cygwin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 05:05:30PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: >Chuck wrote: >>Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>If you don't have anything to say then wait until you do. > > > >>Given the experience I've had here over the last week, and no other >>facility to test if something is finally working, and the fact that >>I've been bluntly told there was nothing wrong with the list multiple >>times when in fact there was, I'd say a single test message was not out >>of line. If it violates some rule then I apologize. > >I'll only add that your logic for sending the test was faulty, since >you had been told why you had the problem. By participating in this >email thread, you had already verified for yourself that email to this >list using your account would work. Anyway, for your future reference, >such tests aren't silently tolerated and repeat offenders have >historically been blocked from the list. I don't mention this because >I feel you're heading down this path. It's just so you understand any >responses you might get in this regard. Actually, I don't recall ever blocking anyone for sending "test, please ignore" messages. There haven't been that many people blocked here. The last email address blocked here was one of Linda W's addresses, at her request and that was just about two years ago. I really hate contributing to this because "I can't send email" messages don't belong here but I wanted to explain what happened (I was extremely distracted yesterday and didn't get to mention this in response to postmaster mail) and I wanted to make sure that people perusing the archives didn't see an unremarked upon "test/ignore" message. Can we let this drop now? Or at least take it to cygwin-talk list if it REALLY requires more discussion? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/