Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:59:44 -0700
From: clayne AT anodized DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: change in 20060704 snap
Message-ID: <20060707015943.GA7409@ns1.anodized.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

-/* undocumented in wsock32.dll */
-extern "C" unsigned int WINAPI inet_network (const char *);
-
 extern "C" unsigned int
 cygwin_inet_network (const char *cp)
@@ -157,7 +152,5 @@ cygwin_inet_network (const char *cp)
   if (efault.faulted (EFAULT))
     return INADDR_NONE;
-  unsigned int res = inet_network (cp);
-
-  return res;
+  return ntohl (inet_addr (cp));
 }

Won't this be returning a full host address rather than a network address
now?

If need be, I could contribute by writing cygwin-native versions of
inet_pton, inet_ntop, inet_aton, inet_ntoa, etc. rather than calling the
windows variants. inet_addr on it's own is already pretty bitrotted at
this point as well.

-cl

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/