X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 22:28:22 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Need help running expect script under CYGWIN... Message-ID: <20060701022822.GC25372@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <5124210 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <44A56494 DOT BC39F2D2 AT dessent DOT net> <5124475 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <44A56D3B DOT 33C6F4D8 AT dessent DOT net> <5125677 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <5128135 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5128135.post@talk.nabble.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:17:31PM -0700, fschmidt wrote: >Igor Peshansky-2 wrote: >>You posted through the web interface at Nabble (which is not associated >>with Cygwin). You might want to do some lobbying for them to include a >>link to the above instructions. > >No lobbying required. Nabble has a wiki-like system so anyone can >change forum description. But those of us who do not use nabble but do try to maintain up-to-date instructions on the web sites that we manage are not particularly interested in getting sucked into maintaining descriptions at two separate sites. There is a catch-22 here, I guess. If Nabble really catches on, it might be necessary to start blocking them just to cut down on people sending email without understanding the rules. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/