X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <44A474CE.7090100@netbauds.net>
Date: 	Fri, 30 Jun 2006 01:48:14 +0100
From: Darryl Miles <darryl-mailinglists AT netbauds DOT net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060614 SeaMonkey/1.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Which list should cygwin development be discussed on ?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com


There is this list, which seems general purpose.  Enough said.

There is cygwin-patches, which claims to be for patch submissions but 
looking at the recent history is actually an open developers list.

There is cygwin-developers, which is a closed list.


Is my more technical discussion better put onto the cygwin-patches list 
?  I'm not looking at becoming a "long-term developer" here.  I'm just 
here to scratch an itch and then go back to other open source projects 
in which I do have a long term developer interest.

Darryl


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/