X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:55:52 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: snapshots: first resort, or last resort? Message-ID: <20060626235552.GA24443@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <001201c6945d$59ca3010$0a3b6080 AT joehome> <44A03D53 DOT 2050707 AT tlinx DOT org> <200606270119 DOT 35807 DOT mailing-cygwin AT schoenhaber DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200606270119.35807.mailing-cygwin@schoenhaber.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 01:19:35AM +0200, Markus Sch?nhaber wrote: >Nevertheless I'd like to propose that the cygwin snapshots shouldn't merely be >called "snapshot" in the future but "stable snapshot". This might help to >provide the cozy and warm feeling which seems to be so desperately needed. There is the small problem that snapshots are not guaranteed to be stable, of course. When we think a snapshot is stable and we're close to a release, Corinna or I ask for testing of the snapshot so that we can get to a release. Otherwise, there are no guarantees. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/