X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:54:08 -0700 From: clayne AT anodized DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: g++ 4.1? Message-ID: <20060626235408.GD6792@ns1.anodized.com> References: <44987580 DOT 32006EA AT dessent DOT net> <449BE972 DOT B1D2CA47 AT dessent DOT net> <449C5B93 DOT 1000805 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <449C88AB DOT 55A2F04A AT dessent DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Assp-Spam-Prob: 0.00000 X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes X-Assp-Envelope-From: clayne AT ns1 DOT anodized DOT com X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com It should also be noted that some of the latest snapshot, or code that still exists in the latest snapshot, will fail under 4.1.1. Specifically: declaration of objects within a label statement. -cl On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 09:52:41PM +0100, Joe Schmoe wrote: > Thanks to all that encouragement, I now have not one but two working > installations of gcc-4.1.1. As Brian said, the cygwin compiler will > configure and make with no problems, except that -mno-cygwin doesn't > work. For a no-cygwin compiler, this is what I did -- I'm not saying -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/