X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:38:26 +0100 From: Buster To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: g++ 4.1? In-Reply-To: <449BE972.B1D2CA47@dessent.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44987580 DOT 32006EA AT dessent DOT net> <449BE972 DOT B1D2CA47 AT dessent DOT net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 23/06/06, Brian Dessent wrote: > Buster wrote: > > > I would love to know how. I've tried a few times, but -4.1.0 has > > trouble with configuration on Cygwin (something about inconsistent use > > of the '.exe' extension if I recall) and fails on 'make install', > > whereas with -4.1.1 I only get as far as the strange [[Assembler > > messages]] quoted at the bottom of this here message. GNU has no > > reports of successful builds of gcc4 on Cygwin. I suppose it's GNU I > > should be asking about it. Can I get a WJFFM? > > WJFFM. I > have never experienced either of the issues you mentioned. The > "successful reports" thing is completely bogus. Just look in the > testresults archive, you'll see plenty of people build and test gcc 4 > under Cygwin regularly. Thank you, that's music to my ears. > > [[Assembler messages]] follow; steps to reproduce: download gcc-core > > and gcc-g++ from the gcc-4.1.1 release. Decompress. Build in a > > separate directory using '.../configure --disable-nls > > --enable-__cxa-atexit && make profiledbootstrap'. (Yes, I did forget > > the --program-suffix.) > > --enable-__cxa-atexit is definitely incorrect. That's only for C > libraries that support it, such as glibc. Cygwin is certainly not one. > I also would not bother with profiledbootstrap, it would not surprise me > at all to hear that it is broken on non-primary targets. Okay, my bad. Thanks again. Regards, Buster. [[Dave, further apologies for quoting your email address in my reply. Today's not my day, again. At least the Dillinger Escape Plan are off the hook.]] -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/