X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <44983B60.7010903@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:16:00 -0400 From: Jeff Johnston User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: newlib AT sourceware DOT org Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: strtod (and atof) on hex numbers References: <20060620171835 DOT GH29251 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20060620171835.GH29251@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com This is a C99 extension to strtod over original ANSI C90 which is what newlib started with. I'll start working on it, but don't expect anything too quick. -- Jeff J. Corinna Vinschen wrote: > This is a newlib issue. I redirected this to the appropriate mailing > list newlib AT sourceware DOT org. > > > On Jun 20 13:00, Paul Biggar wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>atof (and hence strtod) on hexadecimal numbers results in 0.0 (errno >>of 0). This may be related to an old issue where NaN isnt correctly >>parsed. I believe it isnt correct behaviour: >> >>http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/atof.html >> >> >> >>I've tested it for integers in the range 0x8000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF. It >>works properly on >> >>ubuntu dapper, gcc 4.1 on i386; >>debian stable, gcc 3.3 on amd64 >>sunos ?, gcc 3.4 on sparc >> >>I'm using standard cygwin distribution, which uses gcc 3.4.4 (cygming >>special) >> >>Sample code: >> >>#include "limits.h" >>#include >>#include "errno.h" >> >>int main() >> >>{ >> cout << ULONG_MAX << endl; >> cout << 0xFFFFFFFF << endl; >> >> errno = 0; >> cout << atof("0xFFFFFFFF") << endl; >> cout << errno << endl; >> >> errno = 0; >> cout << strtod("0xFFFFFFFF", NULL) << endl; >> cout << errno << endl; >> >>} >> >> >>Is this being fixed? I could find a mention of it before. Does anyone >>know a simple workaround? >> >>Thanks >>Paul > > > Corinna > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/