X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4495CA35.2020804@tlinx.org> Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:48:37 -0700 From: Linda Walsh User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.0.017-1 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Corinna Vinschen wrote: > I have updated the version of vim on cygwin.com to 7.0.017-1. > > This is the long awaited vim 7.0, latest patchlevel 17. Cygwin Vim > still builds from the vanilla sources. > --- Vim 7 seems to still have a few kinks to work out and doesn't seem nearly as stable as vim64. Since vim7 is already out as vim, maybe vim6.4 could be made available as a separete vim6 or vim64 package for those not wanting to be on the bleeding edge? Some important features have stopped working in 7, and judging from the mailing list, there seems to be a large uptick in problems in 7. Either that, or maybe (I'd think more hassle, but...) roll vim-current back to 6.4 and leave vim7 as a future release until vim7 hits 7.1 or so? Or is waiting for a stable version too passé? :-) linda -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/